Navigations

ChewOnTech.com is looking out for our fans to join us! Email us today at chew_jek_hui@chewontech.com

Google Search

Google
 

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Pc Backups are getting cheaper and simpler

Digg!

Slashdot Slashdot It!

2007 may turn out to be the Year of the Backup. Both Microsoft and Apple have built automated backup software into the latest versions of their operating systems, both to be introduced this year.

At the same time, an option that was once complex, limited and expensive is suddenly becoming effortless, capacious and even free: online backups, where files are shuttled off to the Internet for safekeeping.

Online backup means never having to buy or manage backup disks. You can have access to your files from any computer anywhere. And above all, your files are safe even if disaster should befall your office--like fire, flood, burglary or marauding children.

As it turns out, the Web is brimming with backup services. Most of them, however, offer only 1GB or 2GB worth of free storage. Nobody offers unlimited free storage, but lately, they've gotten a lot closer. Two companies, Xdrive and MediaMax, offer as much as 25GB of free backups; two others, Mozy and Carbonite, offer unlimited storage for less than $55 a year.

Xdrive This service, owned by AOL, offers 5GB of free storage. It's polished, easy to use, and as fully fledged as they come. Right on the Web site, you can back up entire lists of folders at a time, a method that works on Macintosh, Windows or Unix.

If you use Windows, however, an even better backup system awaits. You can download Xdrive Desktop, a full-blown, unattended backup program. It quietly backs up your computer on a schedule that you specify, without any additional thought or input from you.

Better yet, a new disk icon appears on your PC (labeled X), that represents your files on the Web. You can open and use its contents as though it's an ordinary, if slowish, hard drive. A Mac version of Xdrive Desktop is in the works.

As a bonus, you can share certain backed-up folders, so that other people can have access to them from their Macs or PCs. (This requires, however, that they sign up for their own free Xdrive accounts.) You can view your backed-up photos as an online slideshow, or organize and play your backed-up music files on the Web page.

Upgrading your storage to 50GB costs $100 a year, which isn't such a good deal. But if your Documents folder fits in 5GB, then congratulations; you've got yourself a free, effortless, automatic backup system. Happy New Year.

Mozy In many regards, the recently introduced Mozy is a Carbonite copycat. The price is $55 a year, storage is unlimited, an automated background Windows program keeps your PC continuously backed up and a Mac version is planned.

Mozy offers 2GB of backup at no charge. If you're willing to do the company's marketing for it, you can nab another free gig for every four people you persuade to sign up.

Mozy is more flexible, too--and more technical. It can back up only changed portions of files. You can specify times and dates for backups (instead of offering only the Continuous option, like Carbonite). You can view 30 days' worth of backups, too--a feature that prevents you from deleting a file from your PC accidentally and then finding its deletion mirrored in your latest backup. And Mozy offers dozens of novice-hostile options like "Enable Bandwidth Throttle" and "Don't back up if the CPU is over this % busy."

MediaMax Talk about value. How does 25GB of free storage strike you?

The service began life with an emphasis on organizing and sharing photos, video and music--which it still does well. But its new Windows backup program, now in beta testing, adds automated unattended backups of any kind of computer files, just like its rivals.

It's pretty bare-bones; for example, it offers no continuous real-time backup, no choice of weekdays--only an option to back up every day, every three days, or whatever. And you can back up only folders, not individual files or file types.

In times of disaster, MediaMax will give you your files back, but won't put them in their original folders. More important, the free account lets you download or share only 1GB of data a month. That pretty much means that to restore your hard drive after a crash, you'll have to upgrade to a paid account. Still, when you're standing there, sobbing over the smoking remains of your dead hard drive, you probably won't mind paying $10 or $25 to get your stuff back.

Would Google have the same home page like Yahoo

Digg!

Slashdot Slashdot It!

Yahoo_Google.jpg

If Google have such a messy homepage, everyone would avoid it like how they avoided Yahoo.

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

This Power supply is just an over kill

Digg!

Slashdot Slashdot It!

Ultra Products' forthcoming power supply takes "insane" to another level. In what's presumably the world's largest, most powerful PSU to call an ATX case home, the 2000-watt Modular X3 comes in at 10.25-inches in length and will reportedly fit "wherever a PC Power & Cooling 1000-watt version will". The +12V rail alone is rated at 1800-watts, which means that it can purportedly handle a 150A load, and just might cause some sort of small disaster if actually achieved. Nevertheless, the smorgasbord of connectors allow for more power connections that most could even fathom needing, but Ultra believes that this PSU should remove all worry over whether or not your rig "has enough juice." While it's easy to brush this off as completely absurd, the latest AMD scorchers combined with a few NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX or ATI R600 cards could easily eat up a good bit of the supplied power, so if a ginormous power supply was the only thing missing from finishing up your energy-sucking rig, Ultra's X3 should be available sometime this quarter for "less than $499."

How Backup HDDVD works

Digg!

Slashdot Slashdot It!

The next generation of optical disc technology holds the promise to change the way we interact with and store digital media. Perhaps the most exciting change is the arrival of High Definition (HD) video, with its glorious 1920x1080 pixel resolution. It’s a quantum leap forward in terms of watching digital content, as its vast resolution reveals a quality never seen before in such fine detail. Because of the rapid escalation of digital file-sharing – especially of video files – Hollywood has been working around the clock to protect HD content. This is especially relevant for one of its primary delivery mechanisms – HD DVD and Blu-ray discs. These next generation discs, with capacities of 30 gigabytes and 50 gigabytes respectively, have their content protected with an array of DRM (Digital Rights Management.) Both are protected with a scheme called AACS, or Advanced Access Content System. This DRM is a great leap forward compared to the weak CSS, or Content Scrambling System, that currently “protects” DVDs. Thanks to Fox, Blu-ray has an additional layer of protection, called BD+, however most discs have yet to support this protection. Although Hollywood has constructed enough DRM architecture to rival the Pyramid of Giza, it has long been suspected that it would be only a matter of time before HD DVD and Blu-ray content protection were compromised. Convinced the golden DRM egg had been laid, it seemed that nothing could penetrate the great AACS wall. And to this day, that great wall still stands. But why crash through the main gates of Constantinople when you can just pick the lock of a long forgotten rear entrance? On December 26, 2006, a member of the Doom9.com forums named muslix64 introduced himself as circumventing the content protection – not the copy protection – of HD DVD. Additionally, he made available an open source program named BackupHDDDVD. At the time, this program was a command line program that bypassed the content protection – providing the individual successfully obtained the title and volume keys associated with the HD DVD. Once the individual has the keys, the AACS protection can be sidestepped, and the HD movie content can be extracted. According to muslix64, it took all of eight days to successfully circumvent HD DVD content protection. Much of the more difficult work, such as extracting the keys, has been alleviated as the once encrypted information has proliferated online. To understand where this stunning turn of events is heading, Slyck.com spoke with muslix64, who agreed to a PM (private message) interview. The mainstream media tends to have many labels for you, i.e. hacker, cracker, pirate, etc., in response to your efforts. What would you call yourself and what would you label your efforts? I'm just an upset customer. My efforts can be called "fair use enforcement"! What motivated you to help circumvent the content protection scheme associated with HD DVD and Blu-ray? With the HD-DVD, I wasn't able to play my movie on my non-HDCP HD monitor. Not being able to play a movie that I have paid for, because some executive in Hollywood decided I cannot, made me mad... After the HD-DVD crack, I realized that things where "unbalanced" by having just one format cracked, so I did Blu-ray too. Explain how decrypting the device and volume keys are critical to your success. Could you explain the difference between the two? The device keys, are the keys associated to the player. The volume key, is the key associated to the movie. I don't care about device keys. I do care about volume keys, because by using volume keys instead of devices keys, I totally bypass the revocation system. There is no "volume key revocation". There is content revocation, but I really doubt they will ever use it. If you use device keys, they can revoke them. Having the volume key means that you can decrypt title's keys (or CPS Unit key in the case of Blu-ray) and then you can decrypt the media file without problem. I was shocked to realize the volume key was not protected in memory! Explain how a movie studio could prevent the general public from taking advantage of pirated HD movies, such as ones currently available via Usenet and BitTorrent. For example, if an individual were to download "Serenity", and play it successfully on his or her Power DVD player - and never updated the software - would it be immune from any Hollywood counterattack? Yes, immune. If the movie is decrypted there is nothing you can do! Or you can use open-source player, like VideoLan, if a player like PowerDVD become more restrictive about playing decrypted movies. There appears to be some confusion to the extent and specifics of your success. Explain what content protection has been compromised, and what content protection is still intact? There is no easy answer but, IMHO, AACS is totally busted. The only thing I can see for now to prevent the attack I have described is to put different keys on every disc! It will cost a fortune for the manufacturing, so I'm not sure they will go that way... People say I have not broken AACS, but players. But players are part of this system! And a system is only as strong as his weakest link. Even if players become more secure, key extraction will always be possible. I know many people of the industry try to cover up this breach, by saying I have only poked a tiny hole in AACS, but it is more serious than that. Only the future will tell. The AACS security layer is almost the same for both HD-DVD and Blu-ray, so they are both busted for good. The only extra security layer is for the Blu-ray format, and it's called BD+. BD+ is not there yet, and I don't know when it will be. May be my "exploits" will speed up the adoption of BD+, we will see... You've recently helped defeat Blu-ray's content protection as well. What were the similarities/differences in defeating this copy protection scheme? Almost the same. I use the same known-plaintext attack for both formats. But media format and encryption are slightly different. Because I already had experience with the HD-DVD, it was really easy for Blu-ray. What are your ultimate goals? Do you feel that most - if not all - of the content protect will be ultimately defeated? If you can play it, you can decrypt it! There is nothing you can do about it. The only thing they can try is to slow people down. To what extent do you feel you can bring your efforts to the mainstream? Do you believe Hollywood's content protect will rendered so impotent that HDDVD Backup (or a similar device) will be utilized to the same extent as DVD Decrypter or DVD Shrink? Probably. There are multiple scenarios here. You can write a fully automated decrypter with stolen player keys, but they will revoke the keys. Anyways, even if they do key revocation, the revocation process will be very slow. It would take at least one month (or more) between revoking the player and new version of movies with the revocation in stores. The reaction time of the community will be way faster than the reaction time of the industry. Explain the differences between DeCSS and your efforts. I really respect the work of DVD Jon and his friends (he was not alone!) They do more than me. They had to reverse a cipher! I didn't have to reverse anything. So technically speaking, it was easier to bypass AACS than CSS. To what extent is your work a community effort? Do you feel that without the community's input, we would be having this conversation today? I was pretty much alone to do the HD-DVD exploit. But I receive a lot of help with the Blu-ray, thanks Janvitos! My 2 programs are only "proof of concept" software. Right now, the community's contribution is vital. They will bring this software to higher level. I just tell people it was possible and I made the demonstration. What PC based DVD players are currently compatible with defeated HD movies? I don't want to give specific names but I can tell you they are all vulnerable [to a] different extent. Let's look into the crystal ball. When would you say people will be able to decrypt, burn, and play HD movies (whether HD DVD or Blu-ray) on their stand alone player? I think they are already doing it right now! I have seen post of people claiming they did that on both format...But I cannot confirm it. Do you see Microsoft Vista's implementation of HDCP being an obstacle to playing compromised HD movies in high definition? No. To my understanding, this limitation is enforced in the player! So if you use an open-source player, like VideoLan, there is no problem. Also, a decrypted movie [doesn’t] have this limitation if you have disabled the security flags. The limitation with Vista seems more on the process and memory protection. But I cannot comment on that, I don't know Vista. Do you see AACS encryption being defeated in the near future? If you’re talking about AES itself (the crypto algorithm), I don't think it will be cracked anytime soon, but we never know. May be someone will find another hole, or another way to attack AACS. You cannot attack the crypto itself, you have to attack the protocol or the procedure. When will we find another way around AACS? No idea... If studios begin revoking encryption keys, do you believe this will pose a significant threat to your progress or overall goals? Players will become more and more secure. It will slow me down, but it won't prevent key extraction in the long term. Does the defeat of HD DVD automatically mean a victory for Blu-ray in the marketplace, or will Blu-ray be just as vulnerable to the community's efforts? The less secure the format, the more people will buy. I know a lot of people will disagree with that, but that's my opinion. Right now, both format are equally vulnerable. We have to wait the introduction of BD+ to see if it is really that secure... In the long run, Blu-ray seems more secure (because of BD+) and now is more expensive. So HD-DVD wins! Describe a potential Hollywood counterattack, and how the community would repulse such an offensive? Making the keys unique per disc will be the perfect counterattack. So we have to start another attack by stealing player’s key and doing the whole AACS decryption. Then the community will win because they have a faster response time to the revocation than the industry. Who do you feel most benefits from your work, and who stands to lose the most? The consumers will benefit. I hope it will enforce fair use, not piracy. Of course pirates will use this technique, and they already did... Studios will lose more money with mass counterfeiting than file or key exchange on the net. Considering the legal problems Jon Lech Johansen endured, are you at all concerned about the repercussions of your work? I'm really concern about that. So I will stay put for a while, and watch the show. When the first BD+ movie [comes] out, I will wake up!

Difference between Steve and Bill Gates

Digg!

Slashdot Slashdot It!

Microsoft's Bill Gates takes the stage in about 75 minutes, opening CES' 40th anniversary event in Las Vegas. Apple's Steve Jobs keynotes on Tuesday morning, Pacific time, in San Francisco.

While analysts, bloggers and reporters will debate different strategies in operating systems (Leopard vs. Vista), entertainment (iTV vs. Home Server, Media Center and Windows Live), digital media (iLife vs. Windows Ultimate Extras and Windows Live), music (iPod vs. Zune) or mobiles (iPhone vs. Windows Mobile), I will focus on the men's personalities and the companies' different approaches to the events. The contrasts in style and substance will be important in making sense out of the companies' announcements.

Compare and contrast:

  • Gates met with bloggers today, while Jobs traditionally limits accessibility to select press, typical broadcast.
  • Microsoft is fairly open with analysts, partners and press about its announcements, while Apple keeps everything secret until Jobs' does the unveiling.
  • Microsoft will stream Gates CES keynote live, while Apple will provide a canned stream hours following the Macworld keynote.
  • Microsoft bloggers will pipe in on the company's announcements, while Apple will tightly control disclosure through its media department.

As presenters, Jobs has tremendous style, while Gates has little. Jobs is a master showman, who can make the slightest technology seem to be the greatest invention. No question, he is mesmerizing. If Jobs has an off keynote discussing his next, new "one more thing," people walk away feeling that if they buy the product their lives will be better for it. When Jobs is on message, people walk away feeling like if they don't buy the product their lives will be worse.

Gates doesn't evoke the same kind of passion, or aspiration. He'd make a hell of a prosecutor, demonstrating great knowledge of the facts, but he's no salesman. If Jobs is the measure of presentation style, Gates is the antithesis.

But Gates and Microsoft do have style, it's just not the obvious superstar quality some people say Jobs evokes. The list above encapsulates Microsoft's style. The company is more open, as should be a platform provider seeking the cooperation of tens of thousands of partners.

Windows has been for a long time the Dodge Caravan of operating systems and Mac OS the Mazda Miata. While lots of folks might want to drive a sporty car, the minivan costs less and is more practical. With Windows Vista, Microsoft is looking to sell a sportier class of vehicle, a SUV with lots of features that handles well and looks good. Apple is headed the same place, as it tries to appeal to a broader range of consumers. Contrasting corporate styles will play a vital role in the companies' quests.

There will be plenty of postmortems this week on the two keynotes and the companies' different product announcements and strategies courting consumers. I'll probably write one, too. I want to say there's more to style or substance than a flashy keynote or rumors coming into an event. I expect Gates won't wow the crowd, which is ironic given Microsoft's silly "The Wow Starts Now" marketing slogan for Windows Vista. Microsoft marketing lacks a style Apple's is full of.

Jobs will win praises for Leopard, iTV and new product versions, such as a revamped iLife. But people will be disappointed by iPhone, I think. Unless Apple pre-announces the rumored mobile, assuming it's real, there will be nothing of substance at Macworld. That's my prediction, anyway.

Microsoft will deserve the black marks for the keynote (it's not Gates' fault), consumer marketing messaging or articulated entertainment strategy. Apple will do better. Microsoft's style is somewhere else, in the platforms it builds for partners and the openness about them. Maybe Microsoft status is appropriate. Microsoft shouldn't shine, but its partners in taking those platforms and building new and exciting products.

Web Antifraud Measure Ineffective

Digg!

Slashdot Slashdot It!

Internet security experts have long known that simple passwords do not fully defend online bank accounts from determined fraud artists. Now a study suggests that a popular secondary security measure provides little additional protection.

The study, produced jointly by researchers at Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, looked at a technology called site-authentication images. In the system, currently used by financial institutions like Bank of America, ING Direct and Vanguard, online banking customers are asked to select an image, like a dog or chess piece, that they will see every time they log in to their account.

The idea is that if customers do not see their image, they could be at a fraudulent Web site, dummied up to look like their bank’s, and should not enter their passwords.

The Harvard and M.I.T. researchers tested that hypothesis. In October, they brought 67 Bank of America customers in the Boston area into a controlled environment and asked them to conduct routine online banking activities, like looking up account balances. But the researchers had secretly withdrawn the images.

Of 60 participants who got that far into the study and whose results could be verified, 58 entered passwords anyway. Only two chose not to log on, citing security concerns.

The system has some high-power supporters in the financial services world, many trying to comply with new online banking regulations. In 2005, the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, an interagency body of federal banking regulators, determined that passwords alone did not effectively thwart intruders like identity thieves.

It issued new guidelines, asking financial Web sites to find better ways for banks and customers to identify each other online. January 2007 was set as the compliance date, though the council has yet to begin enforcing the mandate.

Banks immediately knew what they did not want to do: ask customers to download new security software, or carry around hardware devices that feed them PIN codes they can use to authenticate their identities. Both solutions would add an extra layer of security but, the banks believed, detract from the convenience of online banking.

The image system, introduced in 2004 by a Silicon Valley firm called PassMark Security, offered banks a pain-free addition to their security arsenals. Bank of America was among the first to adopt it, in June 2005, under the brand name SiteKey, asking its 21 million Web site users to select an image from thousands of possible choices and to choose a unique phrase they would see every time they logged in.

SiteKey “gives our customers a fairly easy way of authenticating the Bank of America Web site,” said Sanjay Gupta, an e-commerce executive at the bank. “It was very well received.”

The Harvard and M.I.T. researchers, however, found that most online banking customers did not notice when the SiteKey images were absent. When respondents logged in during the study, they saw a site maintenance message on the screen where their image and phrases should have been pictured. The error message also had a conspicuous spelling mistake, further suggesting something fishy,.

Mr. Gupta of Bank of America said he was not troubled by the results of the survey, and stressed that SiteKey had made the bank’s Web site more secure. He also said that the system was only a single part of a larger security blanket. “It’s not like we’re betting the bank on SiteKey,” he said.

Most financial institutions, like Bank of America, have other ways to tell if a customer is legitimate. The banks often drop a small software program, called a cookie, onto a user’s PC to associate the computer with the customer. If the customer logs in from another machine, he may be asked personal questions, like his mother’s maiden name.

Rachna Dhamija, the Harvard researcher who conducted the study, points out that swindlers can use their dummy Web sites to ask customers those personal questions. She said that the study demonstrated that site-authentication images are fundamentally flawed and, worse, might actually detract from security by giving users a false sense of confidence.

RSA Security, the company that bought PassMark last year, “has a lot of great data on how SiteKey instills trust and confidence and good feelings in their customers,” Ms. Dhamija said. “Ultimately that might be why they adopted it. Sometimes the appearance of security is more important than security itself.”

Sony to shrink future spending on PS3 chips

Digg!

Slashdot Slashdot It!

Sony will cut back on future chip spending and may stop in-house production of the advanced chips used in its PlayStation 3, a senior executive said.

Improving profitability in Sony's chip division is important for the Tokyo-based electronics and entertainment conglomerate, which targets an operating margin of 5 percent in the business year from April, up from an estimated 0.7 percent a year earlier.

Sony Executive Deputy President Yutaka Nakagawa told reporters that investment in chips will come down significantly from the $3.8 billion (460 billion yen) allocated over the three previous business years.

Sony is already producing the Cell chips, dubbed "supercomputer on a chip," using 90- and 65-nanometer circuitry for the PS3, and plans to move onto the 45-nanometer variety by 2009. A nanometer is one billionth of a meter.

Narrower circuitry makes the size of a chip smaller and helps manufacturers cut per-chip production costs.

Components such as the Cell chip and a Blu-ray DVD player have driven up the PS3 price. Lower costs for the high-speed chip are expected to help the new game machine better compete with Nintendo's Wii and Microsoft's Xbox 360.

But finer circuitry also means heavier initial investments for chipmakers as costs for chip-making equipment balloon.

"We tentatively plan to start commercial production of 45-nanometer chips in late 2008 or early 2009. We are going to study carefully whether we should carry out all the capital investment and produce them in-house," Nakagawa said.

"When we first offered the PS2, there were no semiconductor companies that were able to make chips for the machine, so we did it ourselves. But now, there are companies that specialize in (such) chip production," Nakagawa said.

These chipmakers include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. and United Microelectronics, the world's largest and second-largest contract chipmakers, respectively.

"They are aggressively investing in cutting-edge technology. Our basic understanding is that we probably won't need to do everything by ourselves for next-generation chips," Nakagawa said.

Revenue at Sony's chip operations is expected to grow 57 percent to $6.35 billion during the current business year that ends in March, accounting for 9.4 percent of its estimated group sales, although part of its chip sales are made through in-house transactions.

Sales have been driven by brisk demand for chips used in its game machines as well as in digital cameras, Nakagawa said.

Sony's PS3 sales have so far paled in comparison with the rival Wii.

The Nintendo machine outsold the PS3 nearly three to one in Japan last month, according to video-game magazine publisher Enterbrain, which blamed PS3's higher price tag and a shortage of game titles.

Another eBay flaw

Digg! Slashdot Slashdot It!

A hacker has once again managed to pilfer eBay credentials that allow him to masquerade as an official company representative even as he taunts eBay officials on the company's message boards. It's at least the second time the person going by the name Vladuz has pulled off the prank, which is causing many users to question the adequacy of eBay security.

The hacker, said to be living in Romania, claims to have acquired the ability to penetrate the company's perimeter at will. Combined with a rash of hacked accounts, the assertion has created a small but vocal group of users who believe eBay is covering up a massive back door in its defenses.

Vladuz_eBay_screenshot

eBay officials strenuously deny there is any such back door. They admit Vladuz was able to pilfer a limited number of credentials needed to pose as a customer service representative, but insist the servers that administer those functions are balkanized from databases where sensitive information such as customer records are kept. A spokesman said he was unsure if the hacker has access to the company's intranet, but said even if he does, he wouldn't be able to acquire much more than employee phone numbers and employee news. Just two days ago, eBay officials said they had quashed Vladuz's access to employee parts of the network, a claim the spokesman says now appears to be incorrect.

Like all good conspiracy theories, eBay's denials of anything more than a limited security breach has only fueled suspicions that something much more nefarious was afoot. "Nothing is compromised at eBay!" one forum participant, with just a bit of sarcasm, wrote shortly after Vladuz made his most recent appearance.

Even Vladuz couldn't resist registering his skepticism about a cover up. After quoting statements eBay spokesman Hani Durzy recently made to the effect that the hacker had only limited access, the intruder retorted: "Oh really? Crappy email servers, they seem to be linked to the main ebay servers, including financial servers. *haha* Durzy is a big liar." (screenshot here.)

According to Katherine Carington Smith, who is affiliated with the eBay-related blog Pheebay.com, this is the third time Vladuz has been able to enter eBay forums and make "pink postings," a reference to the color of borders designating comments from eBay officials.

Durzy says eBay officials have been working with the US Secret Service and law enforcement officials in Romania to close in on Vladuz. "We're still working with law enforcement to try to bring this guy to justice," he said.

eBay officials quickly removed the postings, but not before we took screen shots. Shortly after the posting of this article, Vladuz graced the German pages of an eBay forum. eBaymotorssucks.com has those screenshots here.

Microsoft Fixes an online ads flaw

Digg! Slashdot Slashdot It!

Microsoft Corp it fixed a glitch in its online advertising platform that led to some merchants being overcharged by thousands of dollars.

!-- OAS_AD('Middle'); //-->
In a statement on one of its blogs, the Redmond, Wash., company said the bug in its adCenter service had pushed up "cost per click" rates - or what an advertiser pays Microsoft each time a Web surfer clicks on an ad.

Microsoft launched adCenter last year, but still lags Google Inc. and Yahoo Inc. (YHOO) in making money from text ads on search results pages.

The software maker said the affected advertisers' accounts will be credited the amount they were overcharged.

On a message board on the WebMasterWorld Web site, some users wrote that they were overcharged by a dollar or two per click. One member, writing under the name Chrisuk, said he was charged $900 for a single click.

James Krewson, who owns Finderscheapers.com, a price-comparison Web site, said he noticed the problem Thursday night. He had used adCenter to buy keywords related to selling DVD box sets online for 19 cents per click, but saw that he was charged $581.31 for four clicks. He sent an email to customer service, and got a response on Friday morning.

Microsoft faces lawsuit

Digg! Slashdot Slashdot It! A company called Office Live it has filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against Microsoft over the software giant's use of "Office Live" for its on-demand productivity tools.

Office Live, which runs sites such as Legalofficelive.com, Realtorsofficelive.com and Accountantsofficelive.com, offers free professional advice to consumers and offers customer leads to businesses. The company is seeking an injunction to prevent Microsoft from using the "Office Live" name.

The lawsuit comes at a time when Microsoft is working to get its highly touted "Live" offerings established in the market.

In November, Microsoft's Internet-based business software, Office Live, became generally available in the U.S., with such features as customer management tools, e-mail accounts and Web site building and hosting.

Office Live, based in the Los Angeles area, registered the "Office Live" trademark in 2002. It initially filed its lawsuit against Microsoft in December in U.S. District Court in California but agreed to withhold serving the suit to allow the companies to pursue settlement negotiations.

When those talks broke down, Office Live served the software giant with a lawsuit earlier this month.

"It is shocking that Microsoft would have so little regard for another company's intellectual property rights that it would select a name belonging to another company," Lenny Targon, Office Live chief executive, said in a statement. "Online software may be the next big thing, but Microsoft has no right to use our trademark without permission."

"We don't think Office Live LLC has a trademark, or that we are infringing any rights asserted by Office Live LLC," a Microsoft representative said. "Now that the complaint has been served, we will vigorously defend our legal position. We also will seek to invalidate Office Live LLC's claim to trademark the phrase "Office Live" in its common connotation."

Microsoft said it views the word "Live" as a descriptor, such as in the case of "AOL Live" and "Vodafone Live," and has indicated that stance to Office Live LLC in previous discussions.

Monday, February 26, 2007

Dell burned down someone's house

Digg!

Slashdot Slashdot It!

Dan writes is to let us know that a Dell Laptop was the most probable cause of a fire that destroyed his home. We must say he seems in good spirits about it, all things considered:
On Monday morning I was heading to work like any other day.. little did I know that my home was being consumed by a raging fire. I arrived my desk to find that the phone was ringing - I needed to come home immediately was the message.

When I arrived home the entire street was blocked with fire and rescue crews. My 130 year old former farm house was engulfed in flames, with thick dark smoke pouring out of the windows and roof. Over 60 firefighters from 4 departments fought the blaze and battled equipment failures due to the near zero degree weather.

Hours later, after investigation the fire Marshall investigator took me aside asked me if I had a laptop computer. Yes -- I told him I had a Dell Inspiron 1200...

It was determined that the laptop, battery, or cord malfunctioned around 15 minutes after I left for work, and quickly spread through the living room, the nearby dining room, and then up a stairwell into the bedrooms. Virtually the entire house suffered extensive fire, smoke, or water damage. The cold weather ensured that water quickly turned to ice which has further burdened and damaged the structure. All of our possessions have been lost - photos, keepsakes, clothes --everything. It looks like the house will be a total loss.
Dan is asking for our help contacting Dell, as they've been unresponsive to his queries:
" I have tried to call Dell to at least notify them of my problems, but each time I have called I get transferred into an endless loop of "Joe" or "Alan" all speaking a delectable version of English I presume emanates from Bangalore. I have been outright hung up on each time I get someone who speaks a reasonable version of English, or sounds like they might be in charge of something. Promises of call backs have gone, of course, unreturned.

Maybe you can help notify them. Or maybe pass along my new motto for Dell--

"Dude, you're getting a burned down house!"

Ouch, this is so horrible. We suppose you could try emailing Dell's Customer Advocate, Marie at: Email: Customer_Advocate [at] dell [dot] com. Any suggestions from the rest of you? —MEGHANN MARCO Dan Writes: Dear Consumerist:

I've been a reader of your site for sometime. When the recent problems began with laptop batteries I read about it at consumerist.com. I own two Dell laptops -- one for my wife and one for myself -- so I immediately checked out the model numbers and batteries against dells website designed for the purpose.

On Monday morning I was heading to work like any other day.. little did I know that my home was being consumed by a raging fire. I arrived my desk to find that the phone was ringing - I needed to come home immediately was the message.

When I arrived home the entire street was blocked with fire and rescue crews. My 130 year old former farm house was engulfed in flames, with thick dark smoke pouring out of the windows and roof. Over 60 firefighters from 4 departments fought the blaze and battled equipment failures due to the near zero degree weather.

Hours later, after investigation the fire Marshall investigator took me aside asked me if I had a laptop computer. Yes -- I told him I had a Dell Inspiron 1200. I had used it briefly while waiting for my car to warm up. My wife had also used it to check her email and news before she left for work and to drop our 18-month old daughter off to work. I had left the laptop in sleep mode with the lid closed on the edge of the sofa in the living room.

It was determined that the laptop, battery, or cord malfunctioned around 15 minutes after I left for work, and quickly spread through the living room, the nearby dining room, and then up a stairwell into the bedrooms. Virtually the entire house suffered extensive fire, smoke, or water damage. The cold weather ensured that water quickly turned to ice which has further burdened and damaged the structure. All of our possessions have been lost - photos, keepsakes, clothes -- everything. It looks like the house will be a total loss.

Since the incident my homeowners company has been very interested in the information about the laptop. I have tried to call Dell to at least notify them of my problems, but each time I have called I get transferred into an endless loop of "Joe" or "Alan" all speaking a delectable version of English I presume emanates from Bangalore. I have been outright hung up on each time I get someone who speaks a reasonable version of English, or sounds like they might be in charge of something. Promises of call backs have gone, of course, un returned.

Maybe you can help notify them. Or maybe pass along my new motto for Dell--

"Dude, you're getting a burned down house!"

Access Radio.Blog.Hitz from your Wii

Digg!

Slashdot Slashdot It!

Access Radio.Blog.Hitz through the Opera browser integrated in Wii. The Opera browser can also surf the web for news and weather and Nintendo has launched its news and weather channels. While if you do not know what is Radio.Blog.Hitz, it is a website that lets you select the songs you want to embed easily.

Is Microsoft trying to earn more money?

Digg!

Slashdot Slashdot It!

Is Microsoft trying to earn more money to secure their future? With internet searches for them dripping to a low and a low delay for it's core revenue generator, Microsoft is facing a tough time, with Bill Gates going to be part time in 2008, Microsoft have to prove to everyone that they can can continue without their founder. My Option of different edition of Windows Vista Why Microsoft is releasing different Vista? I think it is because it is trying to make up with the revenue lost during the delay they could have earned billions in a year of delay. Or are they trying to build up their huge war chest of money to fight a war in the future with companies like Google. While my computer would definably not be able to run Windows Vista and I do not plan to upgrade to Windows Vista anytime soon. Until prices for quad core drops or support for Windows XP ends would I upgrade to Windows Vista.

Microsoft servers ads with malware

Digg! Slashdot Slashdot It!

Microsoft has apologised for serving malware via its websites and Windows Live Messenger software.

APC reader Jackie Murphy reported the problem:

"With Microsoft launching Vista along with their Defender software to protect users from viruses and spyware, it seems therefore to be an oxymoron that they have started to putting paid changing banner advertisements for malware, on the popular MSN groups servers.

"SystemDoctor2006 has made an appearance over the past few days, coming complete with pop-up windows to trap and then cause horrific damage to the computers of unaware users -- causing them to then rush out to purchase Microsoft Defender?

Murphy supplied screenshots of the scam in action:

SystemDoctor 2006 is described by many websites as being a "rogue antispyware/malware application installed by malware".

A Microsoft Australia spokesperson confirmed the malware vendor had slipped through its ad booking processes.

"We have learned that Microsoft was notified of malware that was being served through ads placed in Windows Live Messenger banners. As a result of this notification Microsoft immediately investigated the reports and removed the offending ads, as this is a violation of Microsoft's ad serving policy. Microsoft can confirm that the ads are no longer being served by any Microsoft system.

"Microsoft apologizes for the inconvenience and is reviewing Microsoft's ad approval process to reduce the chance of an occurrence such as this happening again. To help customers protect their PCs from malware threats, Microsoft recommends customers follow our Protect your PC guidance at www.microsoft.com/protect."

Vista Drivers

Digg!

Slashdot Slashdot It!

Click on a driver link to begin downloading:

ATI

ATI Display Drivers (ALL) ATI SMBus ATI WDM Teletext Decoder

C-Media

C-Media AC97 Audio Device SiS 7012 Audio Driver NVIDIA(R) nForce(TM) Audio Codec Interfa More...

Creative

Creative SB Digital Music LX Creative Sound Blaster Creative Sound Blaster AudioPCI 128 (WDM More...

Crystal Crystal SoundFusion(tm) Game Port Crystal WDM Audio Device Crystal SoundFusion(tm) CS4281 WDM Audio Dell Dell Laser Printer 5100cn Dell Printer 5100cn PS Bluetooth Hands-free Audio Device Intel Intel(R) PRO/1000 EB1 Backplane Connecti Intel(R) PRO/1000 PF Server Adapter Intel(R) 82801EB USB2 Enhanced Host Cont More... NVidia NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT NVIDIA GeForce 7300 LE NVIDIA GeForce 6200 More... Logitec Logitech USB Camera (Express/Go) ADS Upgrade to a Windows Vista capable Upgrade your PC's Ram if you want your old system 5% Discount on the ENTIRE Crucial product line! Philips AVerMedia, AVerTV WDM Video Capture (713 AVerMedia, AVerTV WDM Video Capture (Sil RealTek Realtek AC'97 Audio for Intel(R) Audio C Realtek AC'97 Audio for VIA686/8231 Audi Realtek RTL8139/810x Family Fast Etherne More... Silicon Integrated Systems SiS Mirage 3 Graphics SiS 180/181 IDE/RAID Controller SiS 7012 Audio Driver More... SigmaTel SigmaTel High Definition Audio CODEC (fo SigmaTel High Definition Audio CODEC SMC SMC EZ Connect Wireless USB Adapter(SMC2 SMC8013WG Broadband Remote NDIS Device SMCWPCI-G 54Mbps Wireless PCI adapter VIA Secondary Bus Master IDE controller (dua VIA Chrome9 HC IGP WDDM Primary Bus Master IDE controller (dual More... Yamaha YAMAHA OPL3-SAx Reserved YAMAHA DS-XG Legacy Sound System (WDM) YAMAHA Native DS-XG WDM Driver Marvell SysKonnect SK-9822 Gigabit Ethernet Serv SysKonnect SK-9E91 1000Base-LX Server Ad SysKonnect SK-9821 V2.0 Gigabit Ethernet More... BENQ BenQ T90X (Analog) BenQ T505 BenQ T90X (Digital) Voyetra Unsupported customized Crystal Sound Fus Crystal SoundFusion(tm) Audio Device PVD Logitech Mic (IM/Connect) Logitech QuickCam for Notebooks Logitech QuickCam Communicate STX More... Agere Agere Systems HDA Modem Agere Systems PCI-SV92PP Soft Modem Agere Systems PCI Soft Modem Broadcom Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Fiber Broadcom 570x 10/100 Integrated Controll Broadcom 570x Gigabit Integrated Control More... SiS SiS 741 S4-5/S4-6 SiS 650/651 Series More... Atheros Atheros AR5006EGS Wireless Network Adapt Atheros AR5002X Wireless Network Adapter Atheros AR5006X Wireless Network Adapter More... Conexant Conexant Falcon II NTSC Video Capture Conexant AC-Link Audio Aureal Aureal Vortex 8820 Audio (WDM) Aureal Vortex 8810 Audio (WDM) Hauppauge Hauppauge WinTV PVR PCI II (26xxx) Hauppauge WinTV PVR PCI II (23xxx) (Tune Hauppauge WinTV 88x MPEG Encoder (96xxx) More... O2Micro O2Micro OZ6933/711E1 CardBus/SmartCardBu O2Micro OZ711M2 MemoryCardBus Controller O2Micro OZ776 USB CCID Smartcard Reader More... Aureal Aureal Vortex 8820 Audio (WDM) Aureal Vortex 8810 Audio (WDM)
More Vista Drivers

Sunday, February 25, 2007

Nintendo Wii is top U.S. seller in January

Digg! Slashdot Slashdot It!

Nintendo's Wii was the best-selling video game console in the United States in January, and the Japanese company also boasted four of the top 10 games, data released on Wednesday showed.

The figures from market research firm NPD showed that U.S. shoppers snapped up 436,000 of the Wii, which debuted in November for $250 and features a motion-sensing controller that has helped build buzz for the machine.

The second best-selling console was Sony's older PlayStation 2, which moved 299,000 units and outsold Microsoft's Xbox 360 and Sony's newer but more expensive PlayStation 3, the data showed.

Xbox 360 sales were 294,000 while those for the PS3 were 244,000. High-end versions of those machines retail for $400 and $600, respectively.

In December, the biggest month for video game sales due to the holiday shopping season, Microsoft sold 1.1 million Xbox units, while Nintendo sold 604,000 Wii consoles and Sony sold 490,700 PS3 machines.

NPD receives data representing about two-thirds of U.S. retail sales and makes projections for the remainder of the market based on a sampling of consumers. The figures do not include Canadian sales or those from "mom and pop" retailers.

Total sales of video game hardware and software hit $1.3 billion in January, with game sales jumping more than 50 percent to $549 million, though NPD added that was somewhat inflated due to its January 2007 data covering several more days than January 2006.

U.S. game sales charts were topped by Lost Planet: Extreme Condition, a game from Japanese publisher Capcom in which players fight aliens across an icy world.

Lost Planetwas one of three games for the Xbox 360 that made the top 10, the other two being Microsoft's Gears of War at No. 3 and French publisher Ubisoft's Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Vegas at No. 9.

Nintendo had four games in the top 10: two for the Wii, one for its DS handheld and one for its last-generation console, the Gamecube.

What is wrong with people nowadays

Digg!

Slashdot Slashdot It!

Google Trends indicates that over the course of the past year the search term Yahoo” became more popular than “sex”, making it the #1 query on Google. Yahoo apparently faces a similar dilemma with roles reversed: When you search for “Google” on Yahoo, Yahoo thoughtfully displays a second search box as if to tell you, “Hey cutie, you have a search engine right in front of you!”

A puzzling phenomenon? An strange aberration?

Stan Schroeder of franticindustries has an intriguing explanation:

I’ve noticed lately that many users have all but stopped typing domain names directly in the web browser, and started using Google instead. Instead of writing “myspace.com” as the address, they write “myspace” into Google.

I’ve seen this behavior from my coworkers and friends, but it really becomes apparent when you see the top 1000 results of Google searches. Many of the top searches, like “bebo”, “ebay”, “yahoo”, “amazon”, “myspace”, “facebook”, aren’t really searches at all - these terms are mostly written by users who know exactly which page they want, but they’ve gotten used to using Google instead of the address bar.

In addition to direct search engine queries, here are another two possible sources for these seemingly strange searches:

yahoo Entering a term like “yahoo” (without the .com extension) into the Firefox address bar actually performs a Google search and redirects the user to the top search result. Some people are using this shortcut intentionally, while others know nothing about domains and believe that this is the way the Internet is supposed to work.
google toolbar The Google toolbar, which has been installed by many users, is easy to confuse with the address bar.

If users have gotten used to using search engines and search bars instead of the address bar, then this effect should be observable not just for company names but for complete domain names as well. And it is.

The Daily Domainer picked a generic high-traffic domain that receives an average of 30,000 unique visitors per month without any advertising, and analyzed what percentage of these visitors arrived at the site after having entered the site’s entire domain name into a search engine.

is google the new http

These statistics confirm an observable trend: An increasing percentage of surfers uses search engines (most likely through search bars) instead of their browser’s address bar.

But interestingly, there is a contrary development. Large numbers of people ignore search engines entirely and type whatever they are looking for (plus .com) directly into the address bar. This doesn’t just apply to well-known domains they already know exist, e.g. yahoo.com, amazon.com, etc., but also to generic domains they make up on the fly, such as candy.com, cellphones.com or greatvacations.com. This phenomenon is known as direct navigation, and more specifically as type-in traffic.

Stan continues:

Google’s model of measuring hundreds of different factors, most importantly the number of links towards a web site, to establish the importance of a web site, is winning. We already know that it’s more important to have a coolname.org domain to which thousands of site link, than to have a coolname.com which noone links to, but domain names are still selling well, just because of their name. Is it worth it? If Google doesn’t already rank it high, it’s not. Take that into consideration when buying a second-hand domain name.

While search engine traffic is an essential part of any popular website’s success formula, branding and direct navigation may be just as important. In the above example, it is inevitable that coolname.org will lose significant amounts of type-in traffic to coolname.com simply because in many people’s minds .com is the only extension that matters. Domainers know that .com domains typically value 10 to 20 times as much as their .net and .org counterparts, not only because they are more brandable, but also because they get accidental traffic originally destined for all other extensions.

From a website owner’s point of view, relying solely on search engines is a risky strategy. What if algorithms change? What if your SEO expert inadvertently commits a mistake and your site is dropped from popular search engines? What if no-follow giants like Wikipedia keep sucking up link energy and eventually rank higher for your own name or niche than you do?

In summary, we can observe two opposite trends: People who “should” type domains into their address bar end up typing them into their search bar or search engine. And people who “should” use search engines to find what they’re looking for, make up domains on the fly and type them into their address bar. You could call it the Battle of the Clueless.

Is Microsoft paid for the patent that Linux use

Digg!

Slashdot Slashdot It!

LinuxWorld OpenSolutions Summit speaker Jeremy Allison explains some tricky details of Linux/Windows interoperability, what the Novell/Microsoft deal really does for interoperability, and a vision for a future easy-to-administer network filesystem.

LinuxWorld: That sounds like a good project that maybe he can get a Google Summer of Code student to work on for him. So, you’re at Google now?

Allison: I am indeed. And you know what they say about Google? It’s like Fight Club. The first rule about Google is you don’t talk about Google. And the second rule about Google is you don’t talk about Google. Now that’s kind of secretive. But fun -- a lot of fun.

Read more at http://www.linuxworld.com/news/2007/020707-jeremy-allison.html

Pre-installed Linux is the most famous option for Dell customers

Digg!

Slashdot Slashdot It!

28625 people supported the idea of Pre-Installed Linux | Ubuntu | Fedora | OpenSUSE | Multi-Boot on all Dell PCs

14434 people want other open source software like OpenOffice and Firefox to be install besides the common Microsoft Office.

8309 people wanted NO extra software installed

7425 people wanted NO OS preloaded

6475 people wanted Firefox installed as default browser

See more here ( If the link cannot work, here is the url: http://www.dellideastorm.com/)